data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a162/5a162c3ad2527f76495eca9f027e7c546a9335ae" alt=""
When I say that I despise Vogue's alienation of the average woman from affordable fashion, I do not consider myself the average woman. I fully admit that I would spend my last dollar on a new cashmere sweater over a meal any day. I refer to women, like my mother, who run a household, raise children, are professionals, entertain, attend cocktail parties, have dinners at 4 star restaurants (5 star perhaps once a year or on their anniversary), savor a new pair of patent pumps, and light up when Chanel offers a free lipstick sample with purchase at Bloomingdales. When Vogue praises Lanvin for offering a $2,800 frock, and Jil Sander for displaying a $1,300 sheath I can hardly share their excitement. Vogue then goes on to declare with acclaim that cotton blouses were shown by Givenchy's Ricardo Tisci for "as little as $440." Such adoration for such offerings is ill-placed. When a designer can learn to offer items south of $500 (and I'm not talking about cotton items which should be south of $200) then maybe he can have some applause. I think there is a distinction between coveting a $2,500 Chanel iconic purse from childhood because your grandmother always carried hers, and hoping one day to be able to blow thousands for an average looking black dress simply because Vogue ra
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01c81/01c81336bda7f3967c5df78af569e1317ebdb8ad" alt=""
Thanks so much for stopping by my blog today and for taking the comment! I haven't received my Sept. Vogue yet - I'm hoping it gets here today!
ReplyDeleteI found your blog while "researching" the wearing white after labour day rule for my blog. I really like your blog. And yes, I would love a little Chanel handbag, or a Louis Vutton skirt that costs $7000, but alas, I have a life to live and pay for. I am a relentless shopper of good things for less.
ReplyDelete