data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb30e/fb30e9e7c4336e221eba154f41a9ce2a1411411f" alt=""
In a nutshell, the bill would create a species of copyright law applicable to the fashion industry. The protection would require designers to register their original designs within 6 months of introduction to the public (what constitutes 'introduction to the public’ promises to spur its own series of litigation) and limits protection to 3 years from date of registration.
While this would protect designers from having their creations copied and the resulting loss of sales or brand integrity, it also risks having an anti-competitive effect. Copyright law in its conception was designed to promote innovation by offering incentives to those who create. It could be argued that protecting designs under this bill will hinder the free competition in the industry, in terms of resources and price. Some critics of the bill argue that, since the fashion industry is thriving (aside from the economic tsunami currently ravaging the business), there is no need to raise protective force fields around creative designs. I think the limited 3 year scope of protection will not seriously encumber any competition, as might be the case if the time period was as long as that of regular copyright (which is currently the life of the author plus 70 years, after the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 was passed). I'm all for knocking off copy cats with the same force that they knock off originals. What comes of this bill is matter of being patient (just like trying to find a job!)
Happy birthday Mom! You don't look a day of 35 (thanks in part to my style mentoring).
Thank you angel! The effort it takes to look 35 is definitely made easier by having you as my mentor (and those good genes)!
ReplyDeleteI have mixed feelings about such legislation, but think something should be done
ReplyDeletehad no idea about this bill....
ReplyDelete