data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a5f9/8a5f9010a7dcb1ab0164855a4be14811cd858f69" alt=""
I remember when my parents first realized I had outgrown my gap messenger bag days and was ready for something a touch more sophisticated (this was circa 1993, when I was in the 6th grade. My poor parents). A trip to the Coach store ended with a glorious, camel colored, butter soft leather tote, with stamped Coach logo inconspicuously under the top handle. A decade and a half later, and such iconic staples have been replaced by fuchsia, eye catching nylons with flagrant brand identifiers accosting the senses like designer impostor perfume. I'm sure from a business perspective, this was a calculated endeavour to place the brand among the rank and file with premium, luxury houses (had they hired my new company to consult for them, I certainly would not have disagreed with this move. I would, however, have advised against such blatant unoriginality in strategy to compete with the big wigs of bags).
Love them or loathe them, infringement is never the path to dominion. I just miss the days of originality (as in the definition of copyrightable material).
yeah, coach is not so hot these days, but do love their oldies
ReplyDelete